Bahrain: post-race analysis 2017
The race was exciting
from start to finish, and green as well. Better not to have hedged,
of course (this is the first race I’ve offered a hedged bet). Given
I was uncertain how things would play out, relieved and pleased with
the result, and it was good to watch too.
Off the line,
surprisingly, Vettel passed Hamilton, and Verstappen passed both
Raikkonen and Ricciardo.
We then had a sight
reminiscent of a Trulli train. Vettel could run within a few tenths
of Bottas, but couldn’t pass. The German’s pace was clearly
constrained. Hamilton was right behind him but trying to compare
their relative pace was impossible because both were stuck behind
Bottas, and Verstappen was right behind Hamilton.
After perhaps eleven
laps of this Vettel pitted, swapping supersofts for supersofts.
Verstappen got on the radio asking for likewise, and got what he
wanted. However, Verstappen then suffered a brake failure. He was
fine but out of the race (damned shame because he was looking rather
swift).
Shortly thereafter,
Sainz emerged from the pits and attempted to occupy the same
co-ordinates in time and space as Stroll. The Canadian, who must’ve
slapped a witch before the season began, was taken out (the Spaniard
tried blaming Stroll, but it was entirely Sainz’s fault), and a
safety car emerged (relatively rare in Bahrain, had odds of 2.62).
Sainz will have a three place grid penalty next time.
Vettel had been freed
to drive much more swiftly and I was worried this would ruin his
strategy. However, Bottas and Hamilton both had slow stops (the
former because he had to wait whilst the world and his dog pitted,
the latter because it was just a bit slow and he had to wait for his
team mate to be serviced). Vettel claimed the lead, and Ricciardo
came out ahead of Hamilton, but behind Bottas.
Upon the restart,
Bottas had great speed and very nearly passed Vettel. However, the
German kept the Finn at bay and then opened up a gap. Hamilton passed
Ricciardo with consummate ease, the Aussie sliding inexorably down
the order to about 6th (he was not pleased with his soft
tyres, Hamilton also opting for that compound whilst Bottas and
Vettel were on the supersoft).
Vettel was building up
a lovely gap and Hamilton couldn’t pass Bottas. The Briton was also
under investigation for deliberately impeding Ricciardo in the pit
lane by driving slowly, and got a 5s time penalty (personally, I
think this was a little harsh).
Vettel stayed out a
long time, Ferrari wary of trapping him behind Ricciardo. The
Prancing Horse, which appears to have replaced their Jar Jar
Binks-led 2016 strategy team with one led by Tywin Lannister, timed
Vettel’s pit stop to perfection, emerging ahead of Ricciardo.
Further down the field,
Palmer, Kvyat and Alonso were having a prolonged ding-dong, the
Spaniard bemoaning his lack of power, but it was all very tight until
Alonso’s engine decided to stop working altogether.
Vettel set about, on
his soft tyres, reeling in Hamilton. The Briton had to pit, putting
on used softs and questioning that choice (but the team was right to
reassure him they were a good selection). He drove phenomenally
swiftly, caught Bottas and was allowed past (albeit at a strangely
awkward spot) and was catching Vettel by a second a lap. But, there
were not enough laps.
The German got his
second win of the season, Hamilton and Bottas getting the rest of the
podium. Raikkonen, who had been trundling around ahead of Ricciardo
but well behind Bottas, actually closed the gap to a few seconds but
was still 4th (Raikkonen had some sort of issue which
affected him for quite a bit of the race).
Ricciardo ended up 5th,
ahead of Massa. Perez and Grosjean were next, with Hulkenberg 9th
and Ocon in his customary position of 10th. Wehrlein (whom
I’d considered for points at 11) was 11th.
Ericsson and Magnussen
also had DNFs, and Vandoorne had a DNS. McLaren has had one car
reach the chequered flag out of six possibles this season. No
wonder Alonso’s off to the Indy 500.
So, what did we learn?
Perhaps surprisingly
given they’ve both finished every race, we still haven’t seen
Vettel and Hamilton properly toe-to-toe and we still don’t know who
is fastest. Today, Hamilton was catching Vettel very quickly late on.
But Hamilton had to push, and Vettel may well have simply been
managing the gap. If the safety car hadn’t emerged and closed
everything up, we might’ve seen them both in clear air driving at
maximum speed. But the safety car did close everything up.
Personally, I think the
Ferrari just a touch faster, and has the edge on strategy. The
Mercedes has slightly better reliability and a clear edge in
qualifying. We also don’t know how Verstappen would’ve done had
he not suffered brake failure, and that would’ve been interesting
to see.
Force India maintained
their double points finishes, and Renault continued to slide
backwards from qualifying. Hulkenberg’s a good driver but the race
pace of his car is not great. Perez’s Force India seems to work the
other way around (he finished 10 places higher than he started).
Also, Hamilton drove
Bottas into the ground today. He was a day and a half ahead of his
team mate (which is making Rosberg look rather more impressive).
Here’s how the title
races stack up. Drivers first (the two Red Bull drivers each have had
one DNF):
Vettel 68
Hamilton 61
Bottas 38
Raikkonen 34
Verstappen 25
Ricciardo 22
Constructors:
Ferrari 102
Mercedes 99
Red Bull 47
Very, very tight. The
race was tense from start to finish, and the season’s looking like
it’s going to be nip and tuck. As for Red Bull, they *can* still
challenge for the Constructors’ but they need to win the
development war quickly.
Further down the field,
Williams and Force India are very close, and Toro Rosso’s not far
off. It’s all set up rather nicely.
I’ve included a
couple of graphs, a bar chart of Points, Pointless Finishes and
DNS/DNF by team, and a line graph of the top three teams showing
running points totals. I’m keeping those stats largely for my own
interest, to keep track of the development race, but let me know if
they’re tedious or interesting as graphs, and I can post more or
fewer.
Overall, the weekend
was green (obviously better not to have hedged the Vettel bet). Quite
pleased, given I was unsure how the race would unfold and the
qualifying failure was perhaps a little unfortunate.
The next race is
Russia, in a fortnight.
Morris Dancer
It must have been clear from an early stage, if not from the very outset, that Lewis would need a second change of tyres and I simply couldn't understand why he stayed out so long, labouring away behind his team mate, whilst Vettel pulled further away. Had he come into the pits even 5 laps earlier, then victory might have been his, certainly it would have been mighty close. So to my mind Mercedes probably lost this race as the result of a serious tactical error, despite all those brains and fancy computers supposedly providing the best means of planning and securing a win for Lewis.
ReplyDeleteHey, Mr. Putney.
DeleteCan't recall the precise way things stood. He might have ended up behind several more cars and Mercedes were weighing that up.
Read somewhere (maybe BBC comments) that one person reckoned it's Paddy Lowe's departure that's cost them strategic sense. Not sure what role he played in that regard, to be honest, but strategically Ferrari have gone from 2016 bungling to 2017 cunning, and Mercedes have made a similar journey in reverse.
I do think they're going to have to opt for a number one status for Hamilton, though. He's de facto there already.